I am probably not going to say this correctly but I am going
to try. The major truth that I embrace
is that almost everything has a beginning.
I only say almost because I believe that God is eternal and without
prior cause. However, an expanding
universe, no matter what you see as its progenitor, had a beginning.
We constantly search for the beginning of things. It seems part of our nature to want to know
where we and other things come from. I
am not saying that sound science does not offer alternative theories for where
the universe comes from. I do say that like
everything else there is a beginning. If
science tells us that they have found that beginning and it turns out to be a
group of multiverses I am alright with that.
My question then becomes “What caused those?” If it turns out that there are constant
streams of universes being created by some quantum engine I am OK with that
too. Who built the engine? It is not that I will reject science. It I that no matter what we discover we have
to reach a place of first cause. There
must be a prime mover.
I choose to believe that this prime mover is God. It is not logical to me that something can
come from nothing without an outside influence.
I have yet to hear a sound refutation of the thinking that there must be
a primary cause to the effects that are the universe.
It saddens me that many who claim to have faith use faith as
a dismissive to sound reasoning and solid science. I think that this is part of the reason that
good theology and good science are both ignored by well-meaning people. No matter how far back one regresses
causality one must come to the point that there is a prime cause. I think that this cause must be both
intelligent and eternal.
Hubble image of the Crab Nebula - NASA One of my favorite things up there. |
My beloved friend Tom has expressed that he finds the puerile
reply “you must have faith” offensive.
In the context of responding to honest questions about God I must agree
that a dismissive demand that one must have faith is in error. When I come to the end of my understanding I
do use faith. It is; however, wrong to
demand faith when people have honest questions.
I think that the need for faith is attached to the desire
that God has for us to have free will.
It is our nature to believe in things. Those things may be God and his desire for us
or they may be that we believe there is no God.
Either way we have faith in something.
It is also our nature to disbelieve in things no matter how much
evidence there may be for that thing. The
bottom line is that we have free will.
We are not forced to believe. We
choose. This is why I try to be honest
in my dealings with those who do not believe in God.
You cannot convince someone against his will. In our freedom to choose we either believe or
we do not. In my experience, and
therefore, not a universal truth that I can assert, there is often a personal
event or series of events that move us to or from faith. We seek.
It is in our nature to seek out things.
I will not dismiss another’s strong belief that God does not exist
because that is both unloving and disrespectful. I will say that this belief is just that, a
belief. As I said in my opening
thoughts, everything comes down to faith.
I do not mean that in a simplistic way. I mean that until someone can claim to have
full knowledge and evidence of all that there is one cannot honestly claim that
they do not believe in something. The
very best arguments for the existence of or non-existence of God require a
measure of faith. I choose to make my “leap
of faith” in the direction of something rather than nothing.
Wishing you joy in the journey,
Aramis Thorn
Mat 13:52 So Jesus said to them, "That is why every writer
who has become a disciple of Christ’s rule of the universe is like a home
owner. He liberally hands out new and old things from his great treasure
store."
I have found in my dealings with evangelical types, that when they learn that I am an atheist they assume one of two things: that I was raised that way or that I'm angry at G*d. I was actually raised in a very spiritual Catholic household and very nearly entered the Seminary in my early 20s. I would also just say that I'm angry at G*d if that were the case. You can't be angry with a being you don't believe exists.
ReplyDeleteIn my personal journey, I first became disillusioned with the church/community and it was a several year journey before I called myself an atheist, and the journey was wrought with fear and doubt enforced by my church upbringing that I was damning myself. This is not a healthful religious environment, that discourages you completely from questioning what is or isn't.
Some still insist that I'm agnostic because if there were evidence of a god or higher power or powers that created life, the universe and everything, I would gladly believe it. But I don't think there is.
Tom, I agree that it is unhealthy to disallow questions. I believe that questions are a sign of growing faith and that discouraging them is to damage that growth. I write my blog about three days ahead of posting and then edit it prior to posting based on questions or interaction. You will find that I addressed this today.
ReplyDeleteI am thankful for your interaction and totally respect where you are coming from. I wonder what evidence would be acceptable to you? That is not meant as a jab in any way. It is an honest question.
Aramis
I suppose anything tangible. I'm not likely to believe a voice in my head or anything less than a revelation to all humans.
ReplyDeleteIf a god or gods want us to worship them, would they not make themselves known, at least once in awhile to say "Um, I'm here and I did all this?" I think that if there is a god or power that created everything, it has no interest in whether or not we worship or believe in it. I feel that any being/force/source of that magnitude would be petty to want anything out of its creations. I feel that the desire for praise and worship is a very human/animal desire and if a god or the universe is unfathomable in its breadth and depth, then it is quite presumptive to give it human attributes.
It may be possible that some form of life exists out there that is a god to us that might look for our worship or praise or tribute, but I would have a very hard time accepting that such a being was more evolved than us beyond technology. The G*d of the Bible would reveal itself to us as pure love. It would be an attracting force, not a divisive one. Then again, I base that on the new testament. The G*d of the old testament was a vengeful G*d.